crime+scene+script

media type="custom" key="4715005"My name is Detective Dylan. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene at a two bedroom one bathroom beach house at about 3:05. The alleged victim was Felix Navidad. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Kendra Goode. She killed him because she was named in his will and she would get all his money. This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene. The most incriminating piece of evidence was the secret note. The evidence was found at the scene. The test performed was handwriting comparison. The results of the test were that it was Kendra's handwriting but signed as Vera. This connects the suspect to the crime because she framed Vera. The next piece of evidence collected was the ice cubes. It was found in Felix's drink. The test performed was the ph test. The results of the test were that it was 9 base .(What is the Ph of regular water?) This connects the suspect to the crime because she could have put poison in the ice cubes. Another piece of evidence collected was Felix's cup. It was found at the scene. The test performed was finger print comparison. The results of the test were that Kendra's fingerprints were on the cup with Felix's fingerprints. This connects the suspect to the crime because she put the ice cubes in his cup. The last piece of evidence collected was the powder. It was found at the scene. The test performed was ph. The results of the test were that we found her powder from her shoes on the ice cube tray. This connects the suspect to the crime because her powder could have been put in the ice cube and he could have been choking on the powder .(Wouldn't it have dissolved in the water?) According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. Kendra took a shower at about 2:30, Vera and Gene went to take a walk at about 2:00, Alfredo joined Felix and had some cola with him at about 2:30. Then Alfredo went to the bathroom at 2:45 and came back ten min. later at 2:55 and found Felix dead on the ground, Alfredo called the others down stairs at about 3:00. (How and when did Kendra get the poison in his drink?) Therefore, Kendra committed the crime of Felix dieing for her being named in his will so she would get all his money.

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds.__** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || 86% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.__**  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || __**The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.**__  || The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || **__Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.__**  || Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || **__The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene.__** || The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene. || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || **__Conclusion summarizes information.__**  || Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.__**  || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening.__** || Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  || **__Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.__**  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__ Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.  __** || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.  __** || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.__**  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.  __** || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.__**  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.__**  || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 49/57